Congruence of Mental Model of Entrepreneurship with Principles of Effectuation

Authors

  • Beata Krawczyk-Bryłka Politechnika Gdańska Wydział Zarządzania i Ekonomii
  • Katarzyna Stankiewicz Politechnika Gdańska Wydział Zarządzania i Ekonomii
  • Michał Tomczak Politechnika Gdańska Wydział Zarządzania i Ekonomii
  • Paweł Ziemiański Politechnika Gdańska Wydział Zarządzania i Ekonomii

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24917/20833296.152.4

Keywords:

causation, effectuation, entrepreneurship, mental model, mental model of entrepreneurship

Abstract

The article presents two models of entrepreneurship: the traditional (causal) and the effectuation model. In the causal model, strategic planning and competitiveness are considered to be crucial for the venture’s success. In the effectuation model the basis for success is the use of available resources, flexible response to emerging opportunities and building relationships. The aim of the article is to assess the congruence of the mental model of entrepreneurship held by students with the effectuation model. In the conducted research the emphasis was placed on four elements of the mental model: company’s strategy, utilisation of its resources, attitude to risk and attitude to other entities operating on the market. A questionnaire containing 39 items referring to the above-mentioned aspects was used. Participants assessed the extent to which those items described an effective business enterprise. The results indicate that students’ mental model is more congruent with the causal approach. The only aspect that integrates certain elements of causal, as well as effectual assumptions, is company’s strategy. Some differences in man and woman mental model were discovered. Results of the research were used to develop recommendations for shaping entrepreneurial attitudes which include: the need to develop effectual approach in Polish students’ entrepreneurial education, especially in the area of effectual coopetition, treating risk as a safety brake and focusing on possessed resources

Author Biographies

Beata Krawczyk-Bryłka, Politechnika Gdańska Wydział Zarządzania i Ekonomii

Beata Krawczyk-Bryłka, PhD, Gdansk University of Technology, Faculty of Management and Economics. Psychologist, PhD in Management, assistant professor in the Department of Entrepreneurship and Business Law. She is interested in virtual team management, team trust management, psychological aspects of entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial teams. The leader of the project: “Effectuation model of entrepreneurial teams. How do effective entrepreneurial teams operate?” founded by NSC. Quality Lead of People Management & Personal Development in International MBA GUT programme, in 2008–2012 Vice Dean for education. Member of The Scientific Society of Gdańsk and Polish Association of Organizational Psychology.

Katarzyna Stankiewicz, Politechnika Gdańska Wydział Zarządzania i Ekonomii

Katarzyna Stankiewicz, PhD, Gdansk University of Technology, Faculty of Management and Economics. Psychologist, PhD in Psychology. Her research interests focus on diverse team management, psychological determinants of teamwork effectiveness and psychological aspects of entrepreneurship.

Michał Tomczak, Politechnika Gdańska Wydział Zarządzania i Ekonomii

Michał T. Tomczak, PhD in Social Sciences, Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Management and Economics. His research interests focus on Human Resources Management, particularly on employees’ competencies and Assistive Technologies integrating employees with Autism Spectrum Disorders within the digitalised workplace. Head of Research Team in the field of GUT Graduates Professional Situation Monitoring and head of HR Manager and Local Self-Government Management postgraduate programs. Project leader and researcher in several research projects financed by the National Science Centre and the National Centre for Research and Development. Author of articles in scientific journals, chapters in monographs, research reports and Human Resources Management Handbook for University Students. Member of the Scientific Society of Gdańsk and expert of Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange (NAWA).

Paweł Ziemiański, Politechnika Gdańska Wydział Zarządzania i Ekonomii

Paweł Ziemiański, PhD, Gdansk University of Technology, Faculty of Management and Economics. Psychologist, PhD in Psychology, assistant professor in the Department of Entrepreneurship and Business Law. His research interests include entrepreneurial teams, entrepreneurial self-efficacy and effectuation as a framework of decisions (made by individual entrepreneurs as well as those who operate in teams). He is also interested in psychological aspects of holding power in organisations.

References

Cieślik, J., Skala, A. (2016). Nowe tendencje w kształceniu innowacyjnych przedsiębiorców. Horyzonty Wychowania, 34(15), 309–322.

Duliniec, E. (2017). Efektuacja, marketing przedsiębiorców i wczesna internacjonalizacja przedsiębiorstw. Marketing i Rynek, 9, 83–89.

Fisher, G. (2012). Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: A behavioural comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 5(36), 1019–1051.

Gary, M.S., Wood, R.E. (2016). Unpacking mental models through laboratory experiments. System Dynamic Review, 2(32), 99–127.

Gary, M.S., Wood, R.E. (2011). Mental models, decision rules, and performance heterogeneit. Strategic Management Journal, 6(32), 569–594.

Gary, M.S., Wood, R.E., Pillinger, T. (2012). Enhancing mental models, analogical transfer, and performance in strategic decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 11(33), 1229–1246.

Glinka, B., Gutkowa, S. (2011). Przedsiębiorczość. Warszawa: Oficyna Wolters Kluwer Business.

Krawczyk-Bryłka, B., Stankiewicz, K., Tomczak, M., Ziemiański, P. (2018). Modele mentalne przedsiębiorczości: wskaźniki efektuacyjne vs kauzalne. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, vol. XIX, 10(II), 215–229.

Kurczewska, A. (2012). W jaki sposób myślą przedsiębiorcy?, czyli „Jeśli mogę kontrolować przyszłość, nie muszę jej przewidywać”. E-mentor, 5, 20–24.

Mäkimurto-Koivumaa, S., Puhakka, V. (2013). Effectuation and causation in entrepreneurship education. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 1(5), 68–83.

Necka, E., Orzechowski, J., Szymura, B. (2006). Psychologia poznawcza. Warszawa: PWN.

Sarasvathy, S.D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 2(26), 243–263.

Sarasvathy, S.D. (2008). Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Edward Elgar Publishing. Sarasvathy, S.D., Dew, N. (2005). New market creation through transformation. Journal of Evolutionary

Economics, 5(15), 533–565.

Sarasvathy, S., Kumar, K., York, J.G., Bhagavatula, S. (2014). An effectual approach to international entrepreneurship: Overlaps, challenges, and provocative possibilities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1(38), 71–93.

Shane, S., Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 1(25), 217–226.

Spicer, D.P. (1998). Linking mental models and cognitive maps as an aid to organisational learning. Career Development International, 3(3), 125–132.

Published

2019-12-28

How to Cite

Krawczyk-Bryłka, B. ., Stankiewicz, K. ., Tomczak, M., & Ziemiański, P. (2019). Congruence of Mental Model of Entrepreneurship with Principles of Effectuation. Entrepreneurship – Education, 15(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.24917/20833296.152.4